7 results for 'cat:"Patent" AND cat:"Damages" AND cat:"Experts"'.
J. Burroughs partially grants judgment as a matter of law in favor of a pharmaceutical company being sued by another pharmaceutical company for patent infringement. Eli Lilly and Co.'s motion "is granted insofar as the patents-in-suit are invalid on the basis of inadequate written description and lack of enablement." However, its motion is denied as to the issue of future lost profits. The other company's expert based his future lost profit calculations on actual data as well as on Lilly's projections, and explained how he arrived at his own projections. The evidence that the jury relied on was not "impermissible speculation and guesswork," as argued by Lilly.
Court: USDC Massachusetts, Judge: Burroughs, Filed On: September 26, 2023, Case #: 1:18cv12029, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: patent, damages, experts
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Chun partially denies the global semiconductor's motion to exclude the qualitative apportionment opinions of the fabless semiconductor company's expert, Lauren R. Kindler, in a patent lawsuit. Kindler's qualitative apportionment opinions are sufficiently reliable.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Chun, Filed On: June 8, 2023, Case #: 2:20cv1503, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: patent, damages, experts